h1

Kevin Costner still exists: “The New Daughter”

July 1, 2010

Well, I guess it’s that time again. The stars lined up, or the Druids did a ritual, or perhaps it was foretold in ancient texts. Whatever the case, Kevin Costner has returned to once again to remind us that he’s not dead. Of course, anyone who suffered through Mr. Brooks knows that it has been a long, self-inflicted fall from his glory days of The Untouchables and Bull Durham. Hell, by the time his latest crapfest, The New Daughter, ends in a blaze of shameless stealing from better movies, Costner was probably even longing for his more hubristic days of drinking his own pee in Waterworld.

In The New Daughter, Costner plays a novelist and single-dad named John James who has moved his family–he has a nine year-old son and a 15-ish year-old daughter–to a secluded South Carolina town in the wake of a nasty divorce. Now “John James” may make him sound like a Revolutionary War hero, but Costner is thoroughly emasculated in this movie, padding around in a V-neck sweater (the male equivalent of mom jeans) with a pair of reading glasses hanging around his neck. It’s never revealed what kind of novels John writes, but we can be pretty sure his main competitor isn’t James Ellroy. Probably closer to Nicholas Sparks.

The kids have very different attitudes toward the move. His son Sam is okay with it, but his daughter Louisa (Ivana Baquero from Pan’s Labyrinth) hates it, hates the house, hates her life, hates him, and hates the beef jerky John gives them for dinner their first night in their new home. Actually that last one is kind of understandable. Anyway, they go for a walk in the woods and find a big-ass burial mound, which Louisa and John think is cool, but Sam stays away from. When the nine year-old kid is the voice of reason in your film, you know you’ve got a long slog ahead of you.

They go about settling into their new digs, and director Luis Berdejo makes good and certain that we know things aren’t copacetic. Eerie music plays. The camera stalks around the house like a jungle cat. At night Louisa is menaced by strange noises. Really, badly-done, cheap strange noises. They sound like something out of the .midi catalog from a Windows 95 upgrade. Kind of like “eee…ooo…growl-growl-growl” Okay, that didn’t work, but trust me: they’re crappy.

Aside from that, Louisa begins spending more and more time outside and coming home covered in dirt and mud. She begins acting strangely, too. She’s bitter and sulky one minute, remote and detached the next. John tries to reach out to her, but no dice. The other adults he goes to for advice–including his son’s hawt teacher (Samantha Mathis)–basically tell him, “Eh, she’s a teenager. Also she’s starting to get her period, so, you know, there’s that.” Wow, thanks folks.

[And let me just pause here to say there is no way–none!–that Samantha Mathis can now be old enough to play Kevin Costner’s love-interest. Back in the ’90s, I and almost every other 20-something had a huge crush on her and wished she was the chick who lived in our dorm. She is not/not old enough to play Costner’s girlfriend! Liar! Liar!]

Okay, so where was I? Right, so some other crap happens along these lines–the cat gets eaten, Louisa maims a mean girl at school, and pretty soon it’s clear that something is not right with Louisa. John looks into the house’s history and discovers that it has a bit of a history. The previous woman who lives there with her daughter locked the daughter in her room and beat feet. John tracks down the girl’s grandfather who describes his granddaughter going through a transformation like Louisa’s before he finally set fire to his house with the girl in it. He’s awfully cavalier about confessing to arson/murder, but I guess you get more laid back about felonies when you get older Then he warns Costner, “You can’t save her! And you’ll do the same thing!” Or words to that effect.

Well, things go from bad to worse here, since while John was chatting with the family-annihilator, he left the kids with a baby-sitter.  You know, when you leave a psycho-offspring with a sitter who’s not a hot, nubile teenager, bad things are going to happen. And they do. Louisa locks the sitter outside and the bad-sound-effect creatures come for her. We don’t see them, but we hear the sitter scream a lot, so that obviously didn’t end well.

John decides to destroy the mound, but a couple of mound experts from the nearby University show up and beg him to stop. It’s a great archeological find, they argue. Then they barf up some unnecessary exposition to pretty much explain the whole movie. Seems burial mounds were usually built not for humans, but for alien creatures they refer to as “moundwalkers” (really doc? Moundwalkers? Um, exactly where did you get your degree again?) Anyway, the moundwalkers came to the surface to mate with human women to repopulate their species, since they were all male and they needed a queen to, um, lay eggs (seriously doc, did you have to print out a .pdf copy of your diploma before you could hang it on your wall?) John tries to go ahead with destroying the mound, but gets stymied when they unearthed the remains of the babysitter. Isn’t that always the way? Try to do a little landscaping, make the yard look nice, and whamo! Babysitter corpse.

Well, this buys the moundwalkers enough time to stage a nighttime assault on the house, aided by a murderous Louisa. John fights them off with a double-barreled shotgun, and while it would seem that a two-shot weapon wouldn’t be the most effective thing to have in a siege situation, the moundwalkers are considerate enough to attack in ones and twos. Apparently they’re kin to the dumbass aliens from Signs who launch an invasion of Earth, but can’t figure out how to work a doorknob.

[An aside: how did the Signs invaders fare in urban centers? I bet they landed in New York and then got stopped in their tracks at the first subway station when they couldn’t figure out whether they wanted the Unlimited Ride Metrocard or the weekly pass.]

Anyway, John loads up and chases Louisa into the mound, which empties into a massive underground chamber. He fights off some moundwalkers and drags Louisa to the surface, only to confront a lone moundwalker which…doesn’t really do anything. Well, this is enough to best John and he lights off some AmFo, blowing up the mound in a massive conflagration. The movie ends with Sam looking at the burning mound for any sign of his father, while moundwalkers close in on him. Nice job, Superdad, got any other kids you wanna leave to a horrible death?

So that’s The New Daughter, a movie which can’t decide whether it wants to rip off Signs or The Descent. Costner does his best–he practically knocks himself out trying show he’s acting…real…hard! Yeah, it doesn’t work, and what does it say about his own assessment of his career that he tales a role in which he’s such an abject failure of a man that he can’t save his kids from some real lame-o monsters? Maybe he’s being realistic.

Of course if it had been my dad, none of this would have ever happened. You’d get one scene of the mound, some creepy music, then, “Goddamit, Gunmonkey, stop screwing around and help me clean the gutters!” And the credits would roll.

13 comments

  1. What happens next is there a sequel????


  2. And, of course, the REAL problem with CRITICS, is that they are so UNBELIEVEABLY CRITICAL. Seems a “gimme”, but here’;s the REAL DEAL… they are concentrating SO hard on coming up with something witty and hateful, in (I guess)an effort to fulfill their “job”, (ie:critic) that they miss MOST of the plot. I don’t suppose that you caught the parts where Louisa was RAPED by the Mound Walkers, eh? (blood in the tub- BRIGHT RED=FRESH blood, NOT Menstral blood, which is NOT bright red, OR thin) or the part that the way she was eating ravenously, and VOMITING ALL OF THE TIME FOR NO REASON, ALSO ELUDED to the FACT THAT SHE WAS PREGNANT, OR EVEN the EXTREMELY OBVIOUS PART where The “LONE” Mound Walker WAS HER CHILD, SMALL,HELPLESS, HOLDING HIS ARMS OUT TO HIS MOTHER, COVERED IN BLOOD from his BIRTH. Did you even catch the VERY end- when her VOICE changed, and her FACE changed, signaling that she had BECOME the QUEEN???? OR- oh, never mind- you, SOMEHOW, as incredulous as it SEEMS, MISSED THE ENTIRE MOVIE!!!! WHY do you have this job?!? Or- DO you still have it? I guess that maybe Kevin Costner, just MAYBE- WASN’T overacting- ANYTHING subtle was ENTIRELY lost on YOU. Way to go!


    • Awesome reply. I agree. The movie was well made, and without showing an actual rape sheen (e.g. Hills Have Eyes), we know (at least the ones who are attentive enough) that Louisa did get raped, and did get pregnant by the mound walkers. Poor girl. In our country, we have a similar myth about mounds (albeit inhabited by magical supernatural folk who can curse you if you mess up their mound)


    • Ummmm I love you. That is exactly what I was thinking the ENTIRE time I was reading the critics thoughts on this movie!!!! You took the words right out of my mouth! I mean seriously!!! Did they even watch the damn movie?!? Well said Miss Rebecca!


    • Great reply! I don’t understand why people don’t read or watch something more than once to get a better understanding instead of being so quick to dismiss validity. Kevin Costner did great, I just hate the ending & the fact that we were lead to believe that the son died. Sequel?????? Anyone????


  3. I agree totally with Rebecca´s comment and add that this movie is great. Real creepy!


  4. Many people seem to think that flaming a movie makes them oh so great critics and/or intellectual. But since I usually disagree with critics, I wonder what’s the point of their job.
    I agree with Rebecca wholeheartedly. This movie was a very good monster movie that managed to keep the suspense all through the end and a really unexpected ending. I enjoyed it a lot! It was WAY better than the movie titled Monster and that has been praised by some critics calling it a piece of art. Seriously? I felt robbed of my money, time and energy with that one…

    On the other hand, it’s extremely easy to flame a movie. Any movie. If the leading actor/actress is young and attractive, their acting is called lame or overdone; if they’re not young and hot, they get pointed out as looking old and tired and not fresh. If the plot is light, ‘plot, what plot?’; if it’s complex, it’s called a twisted mess and/or a mindrape.
    For example, I LOVED Avatar. But then again, some intellectual-wannabe called it “some boring Pocahontas ripoff with blue monkeys running around a CGI forest where everything has a ridiculous bio USB”. Because of course, how could he keep his status as a brainiac if he happens to like a hit?
    However, praise after praise was sung after The Blair witch project, which I found exasperating, lame, not scary at all and dizzying. Honestly, I was waiting for something to happen during the whole damn movie and only got to see branches, branches passing by, branches and unfocused branches.


  5. there should be a continuation to this movie


  6. It was a pretty good movie just like most of the movies Costner makes ! & I’ll never figure out why Hollywood hates him so much is it because he’s not gay!!!


    • I absolutely agree Ron! He has so many great movies…I loved The New Daughter too. It was scary and creepy and the girl that plays his daughter in that is the little girl from a Pans Labyrinth and I dare anyone to say that movie wasn’t amazing!!! Maybe people don’t like him because 1. He’s not gay…and 2. He stays out of the news and just lives his life. I think he’s awesome and I don’t give a shit what other people think!


  7. I do believe that this review is complete crap but to each his own. I enjoyed the movie all but the end and have been searching for the sequel ever since.


    • Oh ya and those who can’t act become critics. My thoughts if you’re not good enough to do as they do where do you get off rating them??



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: